@conference {bib_73,
	title = {Is it fair? Textual effects on the salience of moral foundations},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {3028-3032},
	abstract = {Many of the important decisions we make have moral implications. Moral Foundations Theory (Haidt \& Joseph, 2004) identifies 5 distinct styles of moral reasoning that may be applied to such decisions. This paper explores how reading text that emphasizes one of these styles might affect our reasoning. After participants read a series of tweets that emphasized the Fairness/Cheating foundation they exhibited an increased reliance on this style compared to when they read tweets emphasizing the Care/Harm foundation. This affected participants{\textquoteright} answers to a questionnaire designed to measure the perceived importance of the different foundations, as well as in their rating of the foundations evident in other tweets. Interestingly, this effect was short lived and was not observed for the Care/Harm foundation. These results suggest that exposure to the moral reasoning of others might temporarily influence what moral arguments we are likely to accept and employ.},
	author = {Eyal Sagi},
	editor = {Gunzelmann, G. and Howes, A. and Tenbrink, T. and Davelaar, E. J.}
}
@conference {bib_67,
	title = {The Moral Rhetoric of Climate Change},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {2063-2068},
	abstract = {Communication in the media about climate change in the United States is complicated by the intensely ideologically polarized state of the debate surrounding the issue; moral rhetoric is an important dimension of how ideology is communicated. In this study we examined how moral rhetoric regarding this issue differs on the basis of a publication{\textquoteright}s perceived ideological lean. To address the question, we built a corpus from a diverse group of online news media that were rated for their perceived ideological lean. Using Latent Semantic Analysis we calculated the average loading for the five moral domains identified in Haidt{\textquoteright}s Moral Foundations Theory (Haidt \& Joseph, 2004) on the terms "climate change" and "global warming." We found that there were higher moral loadings overall for "climate change" with a greater difference seen among the more progressive media.},
	author = {Eyal Sagi and Timothy M. Gann and Teenie Matlock},
	editor = {D. C. Noelle and Rick Dale and A. S. Warlaumont and J. Yoshimi and Teenie Matlock and C. D. Jennings and P. P. Maglio}
}
@inbook {german2011role,
	title = {The role of speaker beliefs in determining accent placement},
	booktitle = {Language, games, and evolution},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {92{\textendash}116},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	address = {New York, NY},
	author = {James German and Eyal Sagi and Stefan Kaufmann and Brady Clark},
	editor = {A. Bentz and C. Ebert and G. Jager and R. van Rooij}
}
@inbook {42,
	title = {Tracing semantic change with Latent Semantic Analysis},
	booktitle = {Current Methods in Historical Semantics},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {161-183},
	publisher = {Mouton de Gruyter},
	organization = {Mouton de Gruyter},
	address = {Berlin, Germany},
	author = {Eyal Sagi and Stefan Kaufmann and Brady Clark},
	editor = {Kathryn Allan and Justyna A Robinson}
}
